Projectiles
the corruption goes deep down to the bone
I know everyone on this platform read it cover to cover. I know I didn’t. By the time I hit page 40 I was nauseated. So I asked my Chinese robot overlord to summarize Project 25 for me and any of you who might want to know or be reminded of the playbook to steal america from the ‘libs.” Forgive the long post but an unvarnished review of their plans reveals how they can be resisted and ultimately defeated.
Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion — Dietrich Bonhoeffer
Project 2025 Primer: A Comprehensive Overview
Page 1: Introduction
Title: Understanding Project 2025: A Conservative Blueprint for Governance*
What is Project 2025?
A policy and personnel initiative led by conservative organizations, including The Heritage Foundation, to prepare for a potential Republican presidential administration in 2025. Aims to reshape federal governance through staffing, deregulation, and policy overhauls.
Origins:
Launched in 2022 as a response to perceived bureaucratic resistance during the Trump administration. Designed to ensure alignment between future Republican leadership and federal agencies.
Key Goals:
- Reduce federal bureaucracy.
- Advance conservative social and economic policies.
- Centralize executive power.
Page 2: The Pillars of Project 2025
1. Personnel Database:
- Recruitment of vetted conservatives for thousands of federal roles.
- Training via the "Presidential Administration Academy."
2. Policy Agenda:
- 180+ recommendations across agencies (e.g., DOJ, EPA, Education).
3. Presidential Transition Playbook:
- A roadmap for Day 1 executive actions, including reversing Biden-era policies.
4. Legislative Strategy:
- Collaboration with Congress to pass aligned legislation.
Page 3: Policy Priorities
Economic Policies:
- Tax cuts for corporations and high-income earners.
- Deregulation of energy, finance, and healthcare sectors.
- Opposition to ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) investing.
Social Policies:
- Restrict abortion access and LGBTQ+ rights.
- Promote school choice and limit federal education mandates.
- Strengthen immigration enforcement.
Page 4: Governance Reforms
- Schedule F Expansion:
Reclassify federal employees to allow political appointees to replace career bureaucrats.
Agency Restructuring:
Weaken independent agencies (e.g., Federal Reserve, FCC) by bringing them under direct presidential control.
Judicial Appointments:
Fast-track conservative judges to federal courts.
Page 5: Implementation Strategy
- Day 1 Executive Orders:
Reverse climate regulations, reinstate travel bans, and end diversity programs.
- Agency Guidance:
Direct Cabinet secretaries to halt progressive rules (e.g., student loan forgiveness).
- Congressional Partnerships:
Pre-draft bills to defund agencies like the IRS and EPA.
Page 6: Controversies and Criticisms
- Democratic Backsliding Concerns:
Critics argue the plan undermines checks and balances by politicizing nonpartisan roles.
- Civil Rights Backlash:
Advocacy groups warn of threats to marginalized communities via policies on abortion and LGBTQ+ rights.
- Legal Challenges:
Potential lawsuits over civil service reforms and executive overreach.
Page 7: Supporters vs. Opponents
- Proponents:
Conservative think tanks, GOP lawmakers, and grassroots activists. Argue the plan restores accountability and efficiency.
- Opponents:
Democrats, civil rights organizations, and federal employee unions. Frame it as a power grab that risks democracy.
Page 8: Historical Context
- Reagan’s Model:
Similar efforts in the 1980s to shrink government but faced bureaucratic pushback.
- Trump’s Schedule F:
Unfinished 2020 executive order revived in Project 2025 to bypass career staff.
Page 9: Potential Impact
- Short-Term:
Rapid policy shifts on climate, immigration, and social issues.
- Long-Term:
Reshaping the judiciary and civil service could entrench conservative priorities for decades.
Page 10: Conclusion & Future Outlook
- Legacy:
Could redefine executive authority and partisan governance, regardless of 2024 election outcomes.
Further Reading:
- The Heritage Foundation’s *Mandate for Leadership* series.
- Brookings Institution analysis on federal workforce politicization.
